Comparison of hemodynamic stability betweenpropofol plus ketamine and etomidate in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft

Authors

  • Shahid Hussain NA
  • Muhammad Sajid khan Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Faiza Iqbal Sir Ganga Raam Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hira Asad Memon Medical Institute Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Taqi Gulab Devi Teaching Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • Yasser Athar Shah THQ Hospital Muridke,District Sheikhupura, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61581/MJSP.VOL05/01/22

Keywords:

Anesthesia, CABG intubation, hemodynamic, surgery.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the hemodynamic stability of Propofol plus Ketamine and Etomidate in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft.

Methodology: This Randomized control trial was conducted in Dow University Hospital, Ojha Campus in the Department of Anesthesia from July 2019 to January 2020. Patients were assigned in group A Ketamine and Propofol combination and group B Etomidate alone. Hemodynamic parameters were measured before induction and after induction but before laryngoscope and ?nally after laryngoscopy. Data was collected on standard proforma.

Results: In this study 104 patients, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included and distributed into two group A and B. 34 (65.4%) and 32 (61.5%) patients were male and 18 (34.6%) and 20 (38.5%) patients with mean age of 57.3 ± 7.7 (44-70) years and 57.4 ± 8.7 (41-70) years in group A and B respectively. Hemodynamic stability was achieved in 4 (7.7%) patients and 15 (28.8%) patients in group A and B respectively.

Conclusion: It was concluded from the study that hemodynamic stability was high in etomidate group patients as compared to Propofol and Ketamine group patients.

Downloads

Published

30-03-2024

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 01 (2024): Medical Journal of South Punjab

Section

Medical Section

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Shahid Hussain, Muhammad Sajid khan, Faiza Iqbal, Hira Asad, Muhammad Taqi, Yasser Athar Shah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.